Journal Articles

Ten top tips: Augmented technological skin assessments — beyond the human eye 

Share this article

Ten top tips: Augmented technological skin assessments — beyond the human eye 

Joyce Black
29 September 2025
Although pressure and shear are known to be the main causative factors for the development of pressure ulcers (PUs), how precisely these forces affect the underlying tissues and lead to tissue breakdown is not fully understood. Thus, different theories have been developed to try to explain the cellular process. These theories include ischaemia, ischaemia-reperfusion injury, impaired lymphatic function and sustained cell deformation. Sustained force on soft tissue leads to hypoxia, ischaemia and eventual necrosis. Ischaemia and ischaemia-reperfusion injury both contribute to tissue damage. Ischaemia is the depletion of oxygen supply to the cells, which can lead to cell death and consequent tissue necrosis. The second aspect causes cellular injury due to the reperfusion of oxygen rich blood to a previously ischaemic area, leading to the production of oxygen-derived free radicals which damage tissues. Impaired lymphatic function occurs due to the occlusion of lymphatic vessels, compromising the removal of waste products resulting from cell and tissue metabolism. Accumulated cellular waste can lead to oedema. Finally, cell-deformation arises from sustained exposure to external mechanical forces. Unfortunately, all these cellular events are invisible to the naked eye. Reperfusion causing erythema of the skin can be seen in some patients depending on the degree of skin pigmentation and degree of redness. Augmented skin assessment is needed to find early signs of damage.

1 Cellular tissue changes from pressure and shear are not visible to the naked eye. 

The cellular level changes lead to inflammation and oedema, due to an abnormal increase of interstitial fluid at the area of injury. The reperfusion of blood into an ischaemic area leads to erythema and elevated temperature from the increased blood flow (Oliveria et al, 2017).

2 The European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP)-National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP)-Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPIA) international guideline on pressure injury prevention recommends the use of temperature and subepidermal moisture as methods to detect early changes in skin due to pressure (EPUAP et al, 2019) 

Detecting pressure damage early can prompt interventions to improve perfusion and reduce harm. The condition of skin and underlying tissue can serve as an indicator of early signs of pressure damage, therefore, routine augmented skin assessments provide an opportunity for early identification and treatment of skin injury, especially pressure ulcers.

3 The degree of ischaemia in skin and soft tissue can be measured by thermography. 

Perfusion of the skin is reflected in its surface temperature. Long-wave infrared thermography (or thermal imaging) measures the temperature of the skin and underlying soft tissues. When a control area is used for comparison, the difference in skin temperature between the control and involved areas can be objectively measured. The ischaemia of the tissues subjected to pressure, when present on admission to the hospital, verify that the pressure injury started prior to admission to any new level of care. Thermographic images of ischaemia from vasopressors not visible initially to the naked eye are visible on thermography with marked temperature loss. [Figure 1]

4 The degree of subepidermal moisture (SEM) can be measured by subepidermal moisture scanners. 

Inflammation is the body’s first response to tissue damage and a mechanism to recover ischaemic injury. The inflammation increases vasodilation and permeability of capillaries, leading to leakage of plasma and creating localised oedema in interstitial spaces of the dermis (Okonkno et al, 2020). The SEM scanner detects changes to a tissue depth of about 4 millimetres (Gefen, 2018). Subepidermal moisture accumulation in the sacrum and heels can be measured and compared to surrounding areas, which were not exposure to pressure. An elevated amount of moisture (more than 0.6 from other tissue) signals risk. SEM is measured daily; the exact number of days is not defined. Recordings of delta (changes) can be entered into a graph for ongoing analysis [Figure 2].

5 You might hear that SEM measures Biocapitance

Biocapitance is the property of the tissue to store electric charge. The capacitance of tissues, called ‘biocapacitance’ because they are in tissues, is strongly affected by the amount of fluid in the tissue. SEM measurement technology captures the skin’s capacitance (ability to hold an electrical charge) by determining its relative dielectric constant (eg, electrical field resistance). SEM scanners measures tissue dielectric properties from an localised electrode placed on the skin, which records changes in biocapacitance (Moore et al, 2017).

6 Thermography and SEM provide accurate readings across skin tones.

Detecting erythema in darkly pigmented skin (Monk levels 9, 10, Fitzpatrick level 6) requires technology. Both thermography and SEM provide accurate data on early ischaemic and inflammatory changes in the skin due to pressure (Asare-Biaden et al, 2024).

7 Thermography can provide evidence of vasopressor-induced ischemia.

A common concern in the critically ill patients on vasopressors is the amount of vasoconstriction in the periphery. Risk factors for severe tissue ischaemia requiring amputation are duration of use and use of vasopressors with alpha-adrenergic activity (norepinephrine and phenylephrine) [Figure 2]. 

8 Ultrasound can detect early deep tissue pressure injury (DTPI)

Since its development in the 1970s, healthcare providers have used ultrasound as a diagnostic tool for a variety of conditions. The technology relies on pulsed sound waves emitted from a probe to penetrate the skin’s surface and determine its underlying structure based on the echo received from reflected waves. In the ultrasound images, structures with a greater density appear bright indicating higher echogenicity (hyperechoic). By comparison, areas of fluid or macroscopic oedema appear dark (hypoechoic). Intermediate-frequency (10-MHz) ultrasonography can detect various tissue patterns and possibly predict the fate of the DTPI. Unclear layered structures and hypoechoic lesions were more commonly seen in deep tissue pressure injury. Discontinuous fascia and heterogeneous hypoechoic areas are more reliable predictors of future evolution of the DTPI to more significant wounds. When ultrasound is combined with thermography, early forms of DTPI can be more accurately predicted (Aoi and Higashino, 2009).

9 Bruises can be detected using yellow and orange light sources in dark skin tones 

Bruises are commonly confused with early deep tissue pressure injury. However, bruises form from haemoglobin breaking down through enzymatic processes in the extravascular space. There are coloured goggles and camera lenses that can be used to block the reflected light allowing the absorbed light to appear darker by comparison (Scafide et al, 2020).

10 Act on your findings by starting preventive interventions.

It is known that clinical assessment tools, such as the Norton and Braden scales do not accurately predict risk in all populations. Even clinical judgement does not always detect risk. Studies confirm that when elevated SEM readings were used to initiate a prevention bundle, pressure injury rates went down (Avsar et al, 2024). Likewise, thermographic findings showing altered perfusion can also prompt interventions and significantly reduce pressure injury rates (Simman and Holster, 2022). 

References

Aoi N, Yoshimura K, Kadono T et al (2009) Ultrasound assessment of deep tissue injury in pressure ulcers: possible prediction of pressure ulcer progression. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(2): 540-50. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181addb33

Asare-Baiden M, Sonenblum SE, Jordan K et al (2024) A Feasibility Study of Thermography for Detecting Pressure Injuries Across Diverse Skin Tones [Preprint] medRxiv. 2024;2024.10.14.24315465. doi:10.1101/2024.10.14.24315465

Avsar P, Patton D, Cuddigan J, Moore Z (2024) A systematic review on the impact of sub-epidermal moisture assessments on pressure ulcer/injury care delivery pathways [published correction appears in Int Wound J] 21(6): e14951. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14951.]. Int Wound J 21(6):e14928. doi:10.1111/iwj.14928

Bates-Jensen BM, McCreath HE, Pongquan V. Subepidermal moisture is associated with early pressure ulcer damage in nursing home residents with dark skin tones: pilot findings. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2009; 36(3): 277–284.  https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3181a19e53

European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific (2019) Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline. The International Guideline. Emily Haesler (Ed.) EPUAP/NPIAP/PPIA

Gefen A (2018) The sub-epidermal moisture scanner: the principles of pressure injury prevention using novel early detection technology. Wounds International 9(3): 30-5

Higashino T, Nakagami G, Kadono T et al (2014) Combination of thermographic and ultrasonographic assessments for early detection of deep tissue injury. Int Wound J 11(5): 509–16. doi:10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01117.x

Holster M (2023) Driving Outcomes and Improving Documentation with Long-Wave Infrared Thermography in a Long-term Acute Care Hospital. Adv Skin Wound Care 36(4): 189–93. doi:10.1097/01.ASW.0000912676.73372.a8

Moore Z, Patton D, Rhodes SL, O’Connor T (2017) Subepidermal moisture (SEM) and bioimpedance: a literature review of a novel method for early detection of pressure-induced tissue damage (pressure ulcers). Int Wound J 14(2): 331–7. doi:10.1111/iwj.12604

Okonkwo H, Bryant R, Milne J et al (2020) A blinded clinical study using a subepidermal moisture biocapacitance measurement device for early detection of pressure injuries. Wound Rep Reg 28(3): 364–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12790

Oliveira AL Moore Z, O’Connor T, Patton D (2017) Accuracy of ultrasound, thermography and subepidermal moisture in predicting pressure ulcers: a systematic review. J Wound Care 26(5): 199–215

Osborne Chambers C, Thompson JA (2024) Shedding new light for nurses: Enhancing pressure injury prevention across skin tones with sub-epidermal moisture assessment technology. J Adv Nurs 80(7): 2801–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16040

Scafide KN, Sheridan DJ, Downing NR, Hayat MJ (2020) Detection of inflicted bruises by alternate light: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Forensic Sci 65(4): 1191–8. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.14294

Simman R, Angel C (2022) Early identification of deep-Tissue Pressure Injury Using Long-Wave Infrared Thermography: A Blinded Prospective Cohort Study. Adv Skin Wound Care 35(2): 95-101. doi:10.1097/01.ASW.0000790448.22423.b0

Free for all healthcare professionals

Sign up to the Wounds Group journals





By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that the Wounds Group are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our privacy policy.

Share this article

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.

I am not a healthcare professional.